"That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat.
-Alice in Wonderland.
"How do we make it more likely - by our design - that more students really understand what they are asked to learn?"*Understanding by Design, Wiggins and McTighe
I'm in the middle of major curriculum reconstruction. My supervisor and the previous art therapist passed on fantastic lessons and a context to teach those lessons, and now I'm trying my best to document it. This process makes me very aware of the gaps between what I expect students to know, and what I actually teach them; what's gold, and what may get in the way.
Handy for me, backwards design is very similar to setting therapeutic goals, which I had lots of practice in my 2nd year of grad school. I say that because my peers will let you know -I wasn't gettin' it. And it's still hard to get. I'm spending hours thinking about outcomes, and evidence, and scaffolding. It will be worth it though because duh -you can't build a house on the sand.
So! Starting backwards....what's the point? What do I ultimately want students to understand?
- Art 1: Visual Literacy & Personal Definitions of Art.
- What is Art? How and why is art used as a vehicle for communication
- Art 2: Looking at Art & Artist Identity
- How do you evaluate art? What artists, mediums, and content inspire you?
0 comments:
Post a Comment